Today, the Nation on TV3 interviewed the disingenuous Cameron Slater about the Lobbying Disclosure Bill (PDF), which has recently been drawn from the ballot.
I often wonder why the mainstream media interview old blubberguts all the time. He is so discredited as a commentator and therefore not a credible witness.
But what should make them think twice about interviewing Slater again, is that he was completely unintelligible, and perhaps still inebriated from the night before?
I often wonder why the mainstream media interview old blubberguts all the time. He is so discredited as a commentator and therefore not a credible witness.
But what should make them think twice about interviewing Slater again, is that he was completely unintelligible, and perhaps still inebriated from the night before?
