In late December 2011, I blogged about the website data.govt.nz, which allows public requests for information from various government funded departments without needing to go through the normal official channels.
While looking through the site, I happened upon the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) ignoring a request for information about the complaints they receive, and this piqued my interest enough to make a formal request under the Official Information Act 1982 (PDF):
I believed my request was pretty straightforward... but unfortunately the IPCA had other ideas. On the 23 December, they replied to my formal request for information:
Well that doesn't come close to answering my formal request for information... as I already had the information Kathryn provided. On the same day, I wrote back to the IPCA:
Kathryn has not bothered to respond to this email and it's now well over the due time for the information requested to be provided.
What is most annoying though is that Kathryn Street's claim that the IPCA is not subject to a formal OIA request for information is incorrect. The Independent Police Conduct Authority Act 1988 (PDF), states:
Clearly the information requested will not prejudice New Zealand's security or our international relations... it will not inhibit the Police from doing their job.
The information requested will not be injurious to the public interest, although it could be injurious to Police credibility... that's the only reason I can think of that would cause Kathryn Street to lie about the laws the IPCA should adhere to.
Not only is the IPCA in breach of the OIA by ignoring the initial request for information, they're also in breach of the OIA under section 16 Documents (3)(b) by not providing details on the reason for their contemptuous decision.
Perhaps the IPCA doesn't uphold any complaints about the misconduct of Police officers, but without the relevant information being provided... I guess we will never know.
While looking through the site, I happened upon the Independent Police Conduct Authority (IPCA) ignoring a request for information about the complaints they receive, and this piqued my interest enough to make a formal request under the Official Information Act 1982 (PDF):
21 December 2011
Dear Independent Police Conduct Authority,
I write to make a formal request for information under the Official Information Act 1982. Please supply me with the following information:
The total number of complaints made for each year since 2000
The number of complaints that are dismissed by the IPCA by year since 2000
The number of complaints upheld as valid by the police by year since 2000
The gender of the people making complaints by year since 2000
The age group of the people making complaints by year since 2000
The region where the complaints originate from by year since 2000
The amount of Police charged for a crime in relation to formal complaints by year since 2000.
The names of the Police charged for a crime in relation to formal complaints by year since 2000.
Please give an in-depth explanation if you're not able to supply any part of this formal request for information.
I believed my request was pretty straightforward... but unfortunately the IPCA had other ideas. On the 23 December, they replied to my formal request for information:
The IPCA is not subject to the Official Information Act, and further, is required by its legislation to conduct its investigations in private.
However some of the data you ask for is available through our Annual Report, which is available on our website www.ipca.govt.nz
For example, the number of complaints accepted in the most recent financial year, and for the previous five years, are noted on p.16 of the Annual Report, and are as follows.
2010/11 2052
2009/10 2049
2008/09 1997
2007/08 2073
2006/07 2016
2005/06 1741
Kind regards
Kathryn
Kathryn Street
Communications Manager
Independent Police Conduct Authority
Well that doesn't come close to answering my formal request for information... as I already had the information Kathryn provided. On the same day, I wrote back to the IPCA:
Dear Kathryn Street,
Thank you for your email.
Most of the information I have requested does not breach any privacy of the Police or the complainants. I would appreciate you supplying me with the requested information excluding the last question.
Could you please direct me to the particular law or piece of information that exempts the IPCA from the Official Information Act 1982?
Kathryn has not bothered to respond to this email and it's now well over the due time for the information requested to be provided.
What is most annoying though is that Kathryn Street's claim that the IPCA is not subject to a formal OIA request for information is incorrect. The Independent Police Conduct Authority Act 1988 (PDF), states:
Disclosure of certain matters not to be required
(1) Where—
(a) the Prime Minister certifies that the giving of any information or the production of any document or thing might prejudice—
(i) the security or defence of New Zealand, or the international relations of the Government of New Zealand; or
(ii) any interest protected by section 7 of the Official Information Act 1982 (which relates to the Cook Islands, Niue, Tokelau, and the Ross Dependency); or
(b) the Attorney-General certifies that the giving of any information or the production of any document or thing—
(i) might prejudice the prevention, investigation, or detection of offences; or
(ii) might involve the disclosure of proceedings of Cabinet, or any committee of Cabinet, relating to matters of a secret or confidential nature, and such disclosure would be injurious to the public interest,—
the Authority shall not require the information to be given, or, as the case may be, the document or thing to be produced.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (1), the rule of law which authorises or requires the withholding of any document, or the refusal to answer any question, on the ground that the disclosure of the document or the answering of the question would be injurious to the public interest, shall not apply in respect of any investigation by or proceedings before the Authority.
Clearly the information requested will not prejudice New Zealand's security or our international relations... it will not inhibit the Police from doing their job.
The information requested will not be injurious to the public interest, although it could be injurious to Police credibility... that's the only reason I can think of that would cause Kathryn Street to lie about the laws the IPCA should adhere to.
Not only is the IPCA in breach of the OIA by ignoring the initial request for information, they're also in breach of the OIA under section 16 Documents (3)(b) by not providing details on the reason for their contemptuous decision.
Perhaps the IPCA doesn't uphold any complaints about the misconduct of Police officers, but without the relevant information being provided... I guess we will never know.
 |
| Auckland Anti-War Protest - 19 March 2005 |
