On Tuesday, The Indian Express reported:
New Zealand Immigration Minister Erica Stanford has come under intense criticism for remarks made during a recent parliamentary session, where she likened emails from Indian nationals seeking immigration advice to spam.
While defending her use of a personal Gmail account for official communication during a session on May 6, Stanford remarked, “I receive a lot of unsolicited emails like, for example, things from people in India asking for immigration advice, which I never respond to. I almost regard those as being akin to spam.”
On May 6, while defending her dodgy use of a personal Gmail for official work, Stanford casually said she gets “a lot of unsolicited emails, like, for example, things from people in India asking for immigration advice, which I never respond to,” calling them “akin to spam.” Really, Erica? Singling out an entire ethnic group as spammers in a parliamentary session? That’s not just careless; it’s racist stereotyping.
This isn’t the first brush with racial insensitivity by coalition MPs. Remember when National’s Gerry Brownlee in 2009, mocked Finland’s economy by calling it a place that “eats reindeer and lingers in darkness,” prompting a formal apology after Helsinki’s outrage. Think back to 2017, when NZ First’s Winston Peters, now Foreign Minister, ranted about “Chinese money” flooding New Zealand’s housing market, fuelling anti-Asian sentiment. Even further back there was former National Party leader Don Brash who ranted about “Māori privilege” in his 2004 Orewa speech, alienating Māori communities. Then there’s the time when MP Shane Reti downplayed systemic racism in healthcare, despite overwhelming evidence. The coalition of chaos has a track record of MPs spouting divisive nonsense, and Stanford’s just the latest to keep the tradition alive. Her comments have ignited a firestorm in India, with India Today and The Indian Express running scathing reports.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, ever the spin doctor, claims he’s “relaxed” about the comments, insisting Stanford “meant no offence” and was just talking about “unsolicited emails.” Nice try, Chris, but you can’t dismiss away Stanford's obvious inherent racist beliefs. With Foreign Minister Winston Peters in India for FTA talks, Stanford’s timing couldn’t be worse. The India FTA, which could push bilateral trade past $1 billion, is now at risk. Why would India trust a nation whose Immigration Minister publicly disrespects and racially abuses its people? Stanford’s half-baked clarification, that her words were “misinterpreted”, is laughable.
There’s really no excuse for such a boneheaded statement. National’s history of racial gaffes should’ve been a warning, yet here we are. If Stanford remains an MP, India might just look elsewhere for trade partners. Meaning that Stanford’s stupidity will cost New Zealand billions.