The Jackal

8 Aug 2014

Jon Toogood - Hero of the Week

In this NZ Herald article published online yesterday, Jon Toogood, the lead singer of Legacy Award winning Kiwi rock band Shihad, sums up why there's so much voter apathy in New Zealand:

How Shihad made their explosive new album 
"Didn't you realise this is a political album?" asks Toogood, leaning over the studio's mixing desk, his eyebrows arched.

Actually, yes. If lyrics like, "Signed off by men in suits that you won't recognise"/"It's a f***ing disaster"/"Have we had enough?"/"Get me out of here" didn't give the game away, then the 20 minutes Larkin and Toogood have just spent detailing exactly what's wrong with New Zealand and Australia's political systems certainly did.

Here's Toogood when he's warming up: "We're being lied to, and that creates apathy. Because people go, 'Are we going to vote for the red one or the blue one?'

"But you know whichever one's in power, they'll sell themselves. The policies are bought by people who have way more money than the average person. So it gives people a sense of powerlessness and a sense of being detached from the whole process. Why bother?"

Then he really gets fired up: "The rich are getting richer, the poor are getting poorer. It's a fix. It's not right and as a society we're morally obligated to look after the people who are hurting. My dad was dying and I watched how hard the nurses looked after him. They don't get paid anywhere near as much as the guy who's trading stocks that are keeping people in poor countries poor and ruining their ecologies.

"Why doesn't the person who looks after people selflessly get rewarded? What about teachers? They were going without pay for weeks. Why is being a ruthless merchant banker being rewarded? It's disheartening. It needs to be rebalanced."

Free speech, information sharing, free-market capitalism and John Key's "snapper quota" line are what inspired Toogood's lyrics for FVEY (the album's title refers to the information sharing agreement between Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US, dating back to World War II), which he recorded with Coleman in the Melbourne studio we're sitting in.

"There were things that were pissing me off that I really wanted to talk about," Toogood says. "Coleman is a singer, he's a political animal, and he's more extreme than we are. He'd go, 'What's this song about? Right, cool, f*** off, have a sleep, first thing in the morning write down everything about this subject. Don't even listen to the music. The writing, the ideas, were fine. I had an overabundance of material."

Despite politically charged songs like The Big Lie and The Great Divide, Toogood denies he's aiming for a career in politics.

"I'm not a political beast, that whole system corrupts people. The system is broken - I don't know what to replace it with. It's frustrating."

I couldn't agree more. That's why Jon Toogood wins this weeks Hero Award.

Key gets the respect he deserves

It's been somewhat amusing to see the right-wings reaction to a video the Internet/Mana party recently posted online showing a large group of young people chanting "Fuck John Key".

Not only have people like Matthew Hooton, Claire Robinson, Cameron Slater and David Farrar's over-the-top responses been a bit of a joke really, they've completely missed the boat on decrying that such chants are a terrible affront to their sensibilities. New Zealand crowds have been chanting "Fuck John Key" or similar for the last four years, so this is nothing new.

In case you missed it, here's the video everyone's talking about:



The other claim is that it was Kim Dotcom himself or his associates who initiated the "Fuck John Key" chanting. However, those making such claims have totally failed to provide any evidence to prove them correct. In fact their diversionary accusations simply appear designed to try and discredit a rival political party. Clearly such unsubstantiated claims have invariably been made by people with an ulterior political motive.

Perhaps the most ludicrous claim by someone with an ulterior political motive is one that was initially made by National party propagandist Matthew Hooton, who tweeted:


Apart from it being a large crowd I cannot see any association between a group of young people in New Zealand chanting "Fuck John Key" and a Nazi propaganda rally. As already established, the chanting wasn't initiated by the event organisers and was instead completely spontaneous.

Furthermore, the "Fuck John Key" chant has been a regular feature at music events throughout New Zealand since around 2009. Those who claim this is a new thing are simply confirming that they're ignorant and live in ivory towers. They really need to get out more and see what New Zealand is really like.

The main point that needs to be made is that there's absolutely nothing comparable between young people in New Zealand voicing an opinion and the propaganda used in Germany by Adolf Hitler to initiate war. In fact it's highly insulting to even suggest such a comparison, not only to those opinionated youth who have a right to express themselves, but also to anybody who was actually affected by Nazi propaganda and the atrocities committed in Hitlers name.

The reality of the situation hasn't stopped the right-wing from trying to discredit Kim Dotcom though. It's perhaps because of his German heritage that such unfounded claims as those published in the NZ Herald today are being made:

Crowd's call likened to Nazi chant

An Internet-Mana Party video clip of a frenzied crowd cheering on Kim Dotcom and chanting "F*** John Key" is being compared to Nazi Germany propaganda - although a political marketing expert concedes it could appeal to youth.

[...]

Auckland University political marketing specialist Jennifer Lees-Marshment said the video's rhetoric about revolution and changing the Government looked effective, but "reminds me of propaganda, chanting-type campaigning more reminiscent of Hitler and fascism [in Nazi Germany] than New Zealand in the 21st century".

It appears that those who support John Key cannot understand why a large proportion of young people dislike him so much. They're trying to dismiss the young people's chanting by initially and wrongly blaming Kim Dotcom for it and then likening those young people to Nazis. This way they can look down upon young people and dismiss what they have to say. In fact it's the right-wings way of coping with the realization that a lot of people strongly dislike the current Prime Minister.

"Negative marketing is never as effective as positive marketing and giving people hope and something to vote for." She conceded the chant might appeal to youth, who the party is trying to reach.

This blanket statement by Lees-Marshment is clearly wrong! Whether negative themes are more effective than positive ones really all depends on what social climate they're being promoted in. Back when the Nazis were getting ready to try and take over the world, the social climate was very negative indeed. Germany was a highly sanctioned and depressed nation after world war one, which in many ways allowed Hitler to gain so much traction with the masses.

The self-professed specialist is also wrong because the "Fuck John Key" message shouldn't necessarily be viewed as negative. Young people who feel strongly enough to voice an opinion and chant "Fuck John Key" will hopefully get out and vote in the September election.

Being that young people have been disproportionately effected by the current governments numerous adverse policy changes, they're also more likely to vote for anybody but National. That's the bit John Key and his supporters really hate, the fact that a lot of young people are strongly opposed to the neoliberal agenda and will likely vote to change it.

Unfortunately it's not just young concert going Kiwis or Kim Dotcoms’ heritage that has come under fire. Right-wing propagandists have also attacked the Internet party leader, Laila HarrĂ©:

Massey University political marketing expert Claire Robinson said the video undercuts Ms Harre's claim to integrity. "Laila Harre was expressing such indignation about John Key's 'sugar daddy' comment and the need for respect in the political debate, and at the same time you have Kim Dotcom posting a video inciting hate speech, in effect.

"It is sinking to such a low, and completely at odds with what she's trying to do, exposing yet again the enormous disconnect between Kim Dotcom's hatred for John Key and the way that she wants to campaign."

For Claire Robinson's claims to be true, Laila Harré would need to be responsible in some way for the "Fuck John Key" chanting. She wasn't, which makes the "experts" accusations entirely feckless!

There's nothing wrong with a political party posting a video showing that many thousands of young people are strongly opposed to the current regime.

In fact the Internet/Mana party was doing the right-wing a favour by trying to show them that their policy direction isn't supported by a majority of young people, mainly because they've been the ones who've had to bear the brunt of National's budget cuts.

While National and their propagandists are busy with their faux outrage and negativity towards the youth of New Zealand, the left-wing should get on with campaigning and winning votes. After all, a change in government is really the only way to ensure that young people change their tune towards our leaders. 

6 Aug 2014

Key resorts to sexist slander

We all know that the Prime Minister is a bit of a clown at the best of times. In fact without his script, John Key often appears to be unable to put a cohesive sentence together. It's not just his speech impediment though, which to his credit he's worked hard to remedy, it's the way the guy thinks that simply doesn't make much sense.

Today, 3 News reported on a perfect example of Key’s idiocy:

Key's Dotcom 'sugar daddy' comment sexist – Harre 
Internet Party leader Laila Harre is outraged the Prime Minister has called Kim Dotcom her 'sugar daddy'.

Ms Harre wants a head-to-head debate with John Key at his multi-candidate electorate event in Kumeu, but organisers say it's purely a public question time.

Speaking on RadioLIVE, Mr Key agreed it's for the locals and not an opportunity for Ms Harre to "grandstand on behalf of her sugar daddy Kim Dotcom".

Clearly this was a sexist and slanderous slur that was designed to belittle Laila Harre and Kim Dotcom. Not only is John Key showing that he's a bit of a creep by implying that Kim Dotcom is only funding the Internet/Mana party because of a sexual relationship with Laila Harre, he's also displaying a complete lack of respect for woman in general.

What else is new? Just a few weeks ago the slimy Key also refused to apologise to Tania Billingsley for the government's mishandling of the Malaysian diplomat case. Because of their incompetence, Muhammad Rizalman bin Ismail, the man accused of assault and attempted rape, was allowed to leave New Zealand and has so far escaped facing justice. Key had previously said that he would apologise but then reneged because Billingsley spoke out against the government.

The rest of National's MPs aren't much better either with nearly 80% of the party comprised of males. Unlike the Labour party, which has worked hard to have proportional representation, that unbalanced amount of males compared to females in John Key’s party is a clear sign that the current government is chauvinistic!

Let’s hope that enough right-minded New Zealanders vote these sexist bastards out.

Help children save the Arctic LEGO


Children love the Arctic and they love LEGO too. And now kids are leading the campaign to ask LEGO to break their partnership with Shell - an unethical corporation who are threatening to destroy the beautiful Arctic with oil drilling. Click here to sign Greenpeace’s petition.

5 Aug 2014

National stiffs us for $180 million

The National party really does appear to be quite desperate for some good news at the moment to subdue the party faithful. Unfortunately for them, and because of their dysfunctional administration, the numerous cases of their incompetence being reported in the media recently looks set to dash National’s hopes for re-election.

Earlier today, the government announced:

ACC Minister Judith Collins today announced reductions to motor vehicle levies in 2015/16 meaning the average New Zealand vehicle owner will be $135 better off each year.

“Earlier this year the Government signalled our intention to reduce ACC levies as part of Budget 2014 – today’s announcement delivers on this,” Ms Collins says.

“ACC continues to improve its financial situation, transforming the way it supports injured New Zealanders and building on its investment returns.”

Judith Collins also tweeted:


That all sounds fine and dandy doesn’t it? However, the National led government could have reduced levies a lot earlier than 2015/16 if they’d only followed official advice.

Today, the NZ Herald reported:

NZ workers and businesses denied $180m in ACC levy cuts

New Zealand workers and businesses are to be denied almost $180 million in ACC levy cuts next year as recommended by the corporation, leaving it with an embarrassment of riches.

The Government has set aside the Accident Compensation Corporation's recommendation that workers and businesses receive $658 million in levy cuts next year, instead cutting them by $480 million as indicated at the Budget.

The smaller cuts were confirmed by Prime Minister John Key at an Auckland Chamber of Commerce luncheon today.

"It comes on top of previous ACC levy reductions of close to $1 billion that we announced in 2011/12," he said.

"These levy reductions are possible because of a number of factors - good management of ACC and favourable economic factors sustained over a number of years.

By “good management of ACC” Key actually means the tougher regime that has ensured many thousands of claimants have been unfairly denied ACC support. That's where most of the additional money has come from. The governments requirement for ACC to dismiss claimants, especially long term ones, has also resulted in a huge increase in court cases, prompting National to try and remove people’s right to have their cases heard in a court of law.

National’s decision to not follow the recommendation isn’t just going to cause ACC a headache in terms of what to do with all that extra cash, the government is also ensuring the general public is being charged a lot more for a lot longer than they really need to be.

This type of fiscal mismanagement isn’t going to be rewarded by voters at the upcoming election. Clearly National should have given people some financial relief, which for those on low incomes could have made all the difference in the world.

Te Tai Tokerau tantrum

The wee spat developing in the Te Tai Tokerau electorate is an unfortunate sideshow that Labour's head office has justifiably tried to put a lid on. Not only has their candidate, Kelvin Davis, shown his incapacity to run a positive campaign, he seems determined to gain media attention by continuing with his unjustifiable and undignified smears against his rivals, particularly the sitting MP Hone Harawira.

Such a thoroughly negative campaign by Davis isn’t gaining him any friends in the electorate and it certainly won’t bring Te Tai Tokerau within his grasp of winning either. If becoming an MP who has won his electorate is his goal, this is clearly not the way to go about it.

Back in 2011, Hone Harawira won the seat by 17% of the vote over Kelvin Davis and on current polling looks set to increase that large majority. In fact there's no way Davis can conceivably win the seat, and in light of this reality it appears that he's simply having a tantrum!

Of course the mainstream media is reporting on every little development in order to show that the left wing is divided. They want the public to believe that the Internet/Mana party alliance cannot possibly work constructively with the Labour party to help form a coalition government. Unfortunately their ulterior motives have now resulted in reporting on the issue that is completely wrong!

Today, 3 News reported:

Hone Harawira is Internet Mana's candidate in the seat. On current polling Mr Davis is not guaranteed a return to Parliament on Labour's list if Mr Harawira wins the seat.

You would expect that a news agency that wants to be taken seriously would learn how to use a bloody calculator properly. Unfortunately that doesn't appear to be the case, with 3 News seemingly not able to read Labour's list or aware that the Labour party itself is currently polling at 30%.

Even at their lowest poll rating, Kelvin Davis at 18 on the party’s list will become an MP again. Here's the Electoral Commission’s MMP seat calculator, which clearly shows that Labour would have 38 MPs in parliament with 30% of the vote. That easily means Kelvin Davis will be a part of any coalition government the left wing is able to form post election.

If Davis expects people to vote positive he should learn how to campaign positive as well.