@NZNationalParty 'Not many, if any'https://t.co/2LAOkEWYOo— New Zealand Labour (@nzlabour) May 16, 2017
@NZNationalParty @nzyoungnats So 14,000 won't be affordable. I think you need to rethink the words you use because if they're not affordable, no-one can buy them dingbat.— Miss BetseyTrotwood (@Suzyiam) May 16, 2017
@NZNationalParty Is this the level of shameful misinformation we should expect this election?— Hayden Eastmond-Mein (@h_yd_n) May 16, 2017
@NZNationalParty Quantify 'affordable' please— Sam Judson (@JudsonSam) May 16, 2017
@NZNationalParty Long overdue. But your major support base is literally banking on this making no difference whatsoever to house prices... Is that a problem?— Tom Hawkins (@DocTHawkins) May 16, 2017
@NZNationalParty How many reserves u building on there?devil in the detail!— Point England Reserv (@SavePEReserve) May 16, 2017
@matroked This is the problem. What have Nats sold off, signed contracts for & promised to others that will ruin NZ for decades to come?— Miss BetseyTrotwood (@Suzyiam) May 16, 2017
@CrAaronHawkins The lack of alternative reliable, trustworthy investment opportunities in NZ is a big part of the housing crisis I think.— Tane Woodley (@tanethegreen) May 16, 2017
@pmbillenglish Seems an admission that @NZNationalParty failed to recognize that there is a housing crisis until election year.. Bribes have no power here.— EncryptThis_ (@NZOpSec_) May 16, 2017
National finally sees housing crisis after putting on the election goggles #fartoolate #nzpol #changethegovt pic.twitter.com/qeb21q0H4I— Jin An, 안진 (@jinan_nz) May 16, 2017
@nzlabour Nats agree there's a crisis after they let Housing NZ fail to meet its building targets and reduced the number of state houses by 2,500.— Marja Lubeck (@MarjaLubeck) May 16, 2017